Going into this trip, Kyoto was the place I was most looking forward to seeing. After all, for a history and culture buff like me, this was supposed to be the Japanese version of nirvana. It was not.

Don’t get me wrong; there are some incredible sights in Kyoto, and those are worth seeing. However, I feel the city is overrated as a whole, and here are three reasons why.

1. Kyoto is a fairly ugly city

The Kinkaku-Ji Temple (pictured in the cover photo) opens at 9am, so I was there by 8:30. Making the mad dash to see the Golden Pavilion (rebuilt in 1955), I had about 3 minutes to take this photo before I and the other few tourists who had managed to get in as soon as it opened were, literally, pushed out of the way so that bus loads of Japanese schoolchildren could each have their picture taken in front of it by their teachers. By 9:15, the complex was overrun, and I was left with the rest of Kyoto.

It seems as though the modern city planners decided that since Kyoto was home to stunning temples and palaces, no additional effort needed to be put into beautification. Architecture is blocky and drab; public spaces are cement-y and drab. Once the tourist sights are too crowded to be worth entering (more on this in point two), the city itself has little to offer, compared to a place like Tokyo.

2. The crowds are terrible

Kyoto is a top tourist destination, so some crowds are to be expected. However, what I found was beyond my wildest nightmares. By 10am, the Nijo Castle (across the street from my hotel) had a line so long it made crossing the street not worthwhile. 

The worst instance of overcrowding for me came at the Fushimi Inari Shrine. A stunningly beautiful complex, it is best known for its paths of torii, or gates marking the transition from the profane to the sacred. In the afternoon, when I was there, it was so packed that one could not move through these walkways.

Such overcrowding makes it hard to visit more than one site per day. You can choose the one you most want to see, get there when it opens, and have a few minutes of peace before the masses descend.

3. Kyoto is a tough city to get around 

This comes with a caveat: in comparison to the majority of cities in the US, it is still a dream. But when put next to Tokyo or Osaka, Kyoto has a very limited transportation system. There are only a couple of rail lines, and while the buses are good, they are slow. And, since the places you’ll want to see are spread out, this makes efficient sight-seeing tough.

More importantly, unlike Tokyo, the announcements of upcoming stops on the Kyoto trains and subway lines were not done in English. In fact, there was significantly less English present in Kyoto as a whole, making navigating the city tougher.

The Nishiki Market was vast, but crowded, even at closing time.

Kyoto is home to a couple of the most beautiful temples I’ve ever seen, but the city itself really did not meet expectations. I’d recommend spending a day or two there and prioritizing your top two or three sights, then using a city like Osaka as your base for seeing the region.

What other destinations are overrated? How about Monaco. Check out why!

8 thoughts on “Three Reasons Kyoto is Overrated

  1. Kyoto has become a lot more crowded these recent years and since a lot of people tend to go to the same places at the same time it’s a bit like Venice the touristy streets are packed while streets nearby are empty. Kyoto is a charming city with lots of small houses if you leave the big streets it’s a great city to walk. There are lots of buses you can use with the day pass and the map given with it but I found that people tried to see too many things in one day. With the 2020 olympics and the crowds of people who will flock to the golden route it is not going to improve. Last summer I went to Kiyomizu dera 3 times and every time I gave up before the crowds. Sites are very beautiful early in the morning and in the evening too and are less crowded.

      1. Last summer I was completely alone in one of my favourite gardens because it’s not a must see apparently 😁

  2. I completely agree. crown is fine but there is nothing spectacular / WOW factor. from natural beauty point of view as well form historic monuments point of view. ofcourse depends on tourist , their experience with travel, and age factor.

Leave a Reply